Back to Reality: Huskies lose 4th in a row
It was too good to be true. The buzz built around the basketball program during the 6 game winning streak was amazing. But now, Northern is back to where it has been for years: basketball irrelevance.
After falling to Kent State on Monday night, the Huskies have dropped their MAC record to 4-4 and are currently riding a 4 game losing streak. Things were looking up for the Huskies before this atrocious display of basketball. The Huskies were riding a 6 game winning streak and were off to a 4-0 start in the MAC for the first time in school history. Xavier Silas and Jake Anderson were racking up Player of the Week awards and Mike DiNunno was finally looking like he was...well...a basketball player.
Almost two weeks after their last win, the atmosphere in DeKalb is filled with disappointment and confusion. How could a team be playing such good basketball for a whole month, and then all of sudden play this poorly?
Well, let's examine what is going with our Huskies.
1. NIU cruised through an easy schedule in their 6 game winning streak. Sure, the Huskies played good basketball, but during the streak, Northern played 3 teams that are ranked lower in both the Pomeroy Ratings and ESPN RPI Rankings (Toledo, North Dakota and Chicago State) and 2 teams that are awful on the road with a combined record of 5-13 (Eastern and Western Michigan). The only "quality" victory the Huskies had was against Ball State, a team that was not playing well at the time, but has turned things around winning 5 of their last 6 conference games.
2. NIU entered crossover play against the all-mighty East division. The East division has historically been superior than the West. This year it has been as usual with the West division going 6-11 against the East so far, with 3 of those 6 wins belonging to red-hot Ball State. The quality of basketball that is played in the East has been clear, as Northern has lost its 3 crossover games by an average of 19 points.
3. The Huskies have forgotten how to play defense. Maybe it is the fact that NIU is playing higher quality opponents, thus exposing their defensive deficiencies, or maybe Northern has lost its defensive intensity during this slump or perhaps it is a combination of both. Either way, the result has not been pretty. After giving up a respectable 64.3 PPG during their six game winning streak, Northern has allowed 87.8 PPG in their 4 losses. That is a difference of 24.4 PPG! Ouch!
4. Northern is running out of gas late in games. The interesting thing about the losing streak is that Northern has actually kept the game close until late in the second half (well, not against Kent State, where the Huskies were out of it after halftime). Here are some of the second half scores:
- @CMU: down 74-71 with 1:21 left.
- Ohio: down 69-66 with 8:30 left.
- Buffalo: down 57-50 with 16:11 left.
So is this a bump on the road for Patton's rebuilding plan or is this program heading in the wrong direction?
Huskie fans can look at this slump (and the future losses that are very likely to pile up in bunches) and declare that NIU basketball is dying. The only problem is, it may never have been born.
Sure, Northern might have had some basketball success back in the Chick Evans Field House days, but that success was sporadic and not great enough to consider it a tradition. I, for one, was too young to remember the last time Northern participated in any sort of postseason tournament, and any recruit or student coming in is less likely to remember it or care about it for that reason.
So I look at the 6 game winning streak as a good thing. It generated some buzz on campus and around the Chicago area. Of course, that buzz is pretty much dead after tonight, but for a second it became a spark for this program. Northern is going to need a lot more sparks to get the program going, but one spark is better than nothing.
The Huskies will need to stop the bleeding and play well in the final stretch of the season when they finish Division play against the West. No one expected the Huskies to do anything against the East anyways. Baby steps are needed to turn a program around, so before we dream of winning the MAC tournament, let us be satisfied with winning the MAC West. Winning the West is a feasible goal, but it will be more difficult after this losing streak.
There is a light at the end of the tunnel still!
Well for starters, Northern has everyone that matters coming back next year. Unless Jake Anderson decides to declare for the draft for some odd reason (he entered the draft last year but never hired an agent), the Huskies should have all of their starters back. Their only losses will be Ante Dzepina and Najul Ervin, both of who play very limited roles on this team. Michael Fakuade, Tyler Storm and Tony Nixon will have another year of experience under their belt, and will be expected to play a bigger role in Northern's rotation.
Add that to the fact that the rest of the MAC West will be taking some heavy losses with the exception of Toledo and Ball State you can see why Northern will most likely be favored to win the division. The East will be tough once again, but in the MAC, no one is unbeatable.
What about 2012?
Silas, Anderson and Kowal will be gone. The starting rotation will probably look something like this: PG Bryan Hall, SG Tony Nixon, SF Tyler Storm, PF Nate Rucker, C Michael Fakuade. Lee Fisher and Mike Dinunno will come off the bench, perfect roles for both undersized players. With a healthy Hall running the point, Nixon and Storm giving you consistent shooting from the outside, and Rucker and Fakuade dominating the paint, this Huskies team could still be very good in their post-Silas era.
But the question being asked should not be whether or not the Huskies will be succesfull in 2 years. The question should be: can this team build on each season's success and become a perennial powerhouse not only in the MAC but perhaps in the whole Mid-West?
Later this week, I will talk about the long term outlook of this program.
0 recs |
8 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
You need that home cooking
when you see a team that posts a home record of 43-44 since 2002…… well, that’s not a recipe for success and certainly not an indication that your program is heading for “powerhouse” status
this program just seems to be treading water – just one man’s opinion
by BigDHuskie on Feb 2, 2010 11:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Since 2002..
That doesn’t really help you much. Not one of these guys was on the team them. Some hadn’t even started high school.
For college sports, anything more then 3 years back isn’t too relevant, especially when you factor in a coaching change. I doubt the numbers are any good for the last 3 seasons either, just don’t think the years 2002 – 2006 have much to do with our current team or the future.
by Grinder in Training on Feb 2, 2010 12:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Home court advantage...
only works when you have an atmosphere where the opposing team is intimidated to come in and play.
You need a vicious crowd and a sense of pride about your program. Huskies are far from that right now.
by huskieod09 on Feb 2, 2010 4:23 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
patience
well, I graduated in 94 when Molinari took the team to the tourney my freshman year and we lost by 2 in the opening round. I think the AD is trying to be patient similar to Joe Novak.
Thing is in Basketball you need a few good players and some decent role players. My gut is all the guys are all role players. Back in 91, Mike Lipniski was a freshman and was runner up of Mr. Basketball his senior year. that is the recruiting. Patton isn’t from Chicgo so it’ll take time for him to get his roots in the area and some good players.
by Huskie94GrantSouth on Feb 2, 2010 10:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Long term reality
I have to disagree with Grinder…..I certainlly agree that this group of players cant’t relate to 2002, BUT when you’re recruiting for future developement of the program, you have to look at the trend of this hoops program……..where have we been and where are we going???
add to that the low student turnout and lack of excitement on campus
Believe me, I thought when coach Judson came in, that was a turning point…….it turned out not to be the case…….now we have coach Patton who does not have an established recruiting base in the Chicago or midwest market……..I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t see this thing turning around in the near future
by BigDHuskie on Feb 2, 2010 10:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Knew this was coming...
One reason I haven’t been popping up on the article list here isn’t that I was ashamed of my fire Patton column a while back. The six-game streak didn’t get the best of me. Life caught up with me finally. What I was saying for those six wins-in-a-row was that this is what generally happens with NIU basketball.
Seems like every season they hit a good run and 3 or 4-out-of-5 and the faithful/believers get all excited and tingly on the inside. Then…the real Huskies rear their ugly heads and lose 3 or 4-out-of-5 and lose whatever ground they gained in the win-loss column. Toward the end of the year NIU will hit another .500 stretch that will probably save Patton his job for another year and many on here and other places will speak of improvement.
If I said this five games ago, I’d a been berated by many of you. Some call me a pessimist (I prefer realist, by the way) but the fact is, the Huskies are who I (and many others) thought they were. They’re the same mistake-riddled team that plays in the MAC West, which unlike football, is the weaker basketball conference.
Xavier Silas is a good scorer, one which NIU hasn’t had here in awhile, but he’s no savior. He makes the same bad mistakes and can’t play defense to save his life either. Sean Kowal is not a true DI-A big man, he’s too much of a pacifist in the paint. DiNunno has upside but nobody is breaking his bad habits (3-point shot, the biggest). Tony Nixon has true potential but needs the right coaching, can Patton offer that?
The biggest problem I see in NIU? No chemistry. No great displays of teamwork or passing, or running an effective fast-break. No dynamic qualities at all to a team that doesn’t have the talent to not have dynamics. This isn’t the 1970s Indiana Hoosiers where a “boring” offense could wallop teams because it had good chemistry and teamwork and players. NIU doesn’t have the talent to put up great percentages, so maybe a little “street ball” or using the raw athletic talent of these guys is needed to win. This team needs either a new system, a new philosophy or new players. Only one is reasonable for this season.
by Jerry Burnes on Feb 3, 2010 12:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, put a fork in them, they're done
Silas goes 4 for 15 from the field……..where’s the D??
by BigDHuskie on Feb 3, 2010 11:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
"Later this week, I will talk about the long term outlook of this program."
Huskieod09, I check back about every day for your follow-up article. Hope you haven’t lost interest…
by NIUACCY on Feb 21, 2010 7:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 












